I have recently returned to model railwaying after a hiatus of over a decade. Since I last modelled, things have changed considerably, with the wide availability of modelling software which allows layouts to be carefully designed in advance – ensuring the design will fit in the space, and that the required track is available.
In terms of track, most modellers now recommend Peco Streamline track for a range of reasons including: it is believed to be better running, the point radii are more suitable for high speed running of large locos, and there is a wider range of pre-made track pieces available. With all that said, I still have a large collection of SeTrack so I decided to design my layout to work with this track to avoid the cost of replacing it with newer Streamline.
Building a basic circle with SeTrack is simple enough, but more complex layouts can become tricky, and so I decided to look on google for some standard geometry layouts to help me. Hornby provide a fairly basic layout themselves which is partially useful for curved points, but I was unable to find any other geometry sites that included a comprehensive set of correct geometries. The best I managed to find was FreeTrackPlans.com which was a very useful starting point, but sadly includes several examples which don’t actually fit very well together.
Below are a large set of track geometries I have designed in AnyRail 5. The AnyRail plan is also available from the downloads page at DIYMediaHome (my more technical oriented website). I should note that there are some examples below that technically don’t fit perfectly – however I have restricted these imperfections to instances where the problem is caused by a straight piece which is fractionally too short. I believe that in a real world model this error is so small that it wont matter, and furthermore that a modeller could easily correct them by using a longer straight piece and cutting it to length. Such very minor mismatches are highlighted in pink at the joint in question. All such imperfections are within the AnyRail tolerances – as their manual says: “Sometimes you can make the track fit by using the play (wiggle room) in the track. While this can be considered cheating, sometimes you don’t even notice that you’re doing just that when laying real track”.
You may notice a lot of level-crossings at the ends of each geometry – these are present to demonstrate that the track at the ends is equal in length and the correct 67mm parallel separation.
Where shown the grid lines illustrate 50cm squares for scale purposes
One last thing to note are the following specifications for HO and OO gauge track standards. The geometries below are for 67mm Hornby/SeTrack, not for 50mm Peco/Streamline
4mm OO Gauge track geometry – Hornby Standard, Peco Setrack, & Bachmann Branchline
- Track gauge: 16.5mm
- Track spacing: 67mm
- Rail heights: code 100
- 1st curve radius: 371mm
- 2nd curve radius: 438mm
- 3rd curve radius: 505mm
- 4th curve radius: 571.5mm
4mm HO Gauge track geometry – Peco Streamline
- Track gauge: 16.5mm
- Track spacing: 50mm
- Rail heights: code 100, 83 or 75
- 1st curve radius: 371mm
- 2nd curve radius: 438mm
- 3rd curve radius: 505mm
- 4th curve radius: 571.5mm
Updates
- 24-Sept-2015: Added 15 new geometries, mostly of stations
- 9-Mar-2017: Added 8 new geometries
Hornby 4 track loop standard dimensions
Standard parallel turnout geometries
Express parallel turnout geometries
Angled turnout geometries
Curved turnout geometries
X-crossing and Scissor-crossing geometries
Y-junction and T-junction geometries
Basic Station geometries
Major station geometries
Curved station geometries
Terminus station with turntable geometries
Turntable geometries
4-way junction geometries
Other geometries
.
Found this useful? Please do let us know by dropping a comment below. If you would like to subscribe please use the subscribe link on the menu at the top right. You can also share this with your friends by using the social links below. Cheers.
What size is the full 4 track layout please useing the 4th radius ?
The radius of 4th radius is 572mm – so the total diameter will be 1144mm (1.15m or 45 inches). That is to the track centre, so you’d need to add on a small amount for the physical space required. I’d suggest adding on half a track width at either side, and half a track spacing at either side. That gives a grand total of 1228mm of space needed (1.3m or 48 1/3 inches). I’d want a little margin for error on top of that myself.
Super item, Jon. Sorry if I’ve missed it here, but when you mention track spacing, e.g H0 as 50mm, how is that space measured? Is it the space between the edges of the sleepers of two tracks or say, from track centre to track centre?
Track centre to centre.
Thank you for doing this, it has helped me realise what can be achieved.